Harrow Council for Justice
a campaigning national organisation - promoting the principle of 'different but equal'

About us   Integration    News   HCJ Letters    Published letters   Recruitment & discrimination    Education    Contact

    Our positions
  • people are not blind to colour in a colour conscious society
  • racism affects black and white people both but differently
  • racial harassment is anti human rights - more than hate crime
  • equal opportunity is to practise 'different but equal'
Homepage News headlines

Community grants in Harrow setting


There is a need to contextualise the Harrow Council’s themes and outcomes and the maximum grant award available.

In early 1980s, equal opportunities and community consultation were alien concepts for the council which  under the leadership of a Hatch End Councillor, was much behind in providing services which meet the needs and aspirations of different but equally important groups of residents in the borough.

The extensive argument and persuasion by the community leaders at the time, including many who later formed the Harrow Council for Justice, forced the council to revisit the criteria of its services. However, because of its lack of the capacity and political responsibility to make appropriate choices and make the services compatible with the local needs, the council cleverly tempted the voluntary community groups to support their communities through some financial help from the council. Thus, the use of the community grants to fill in the gaps in the service provision due to the council’s policies and practices based on dominant norms.

These arrangements  where the voluntary sector not only does what the council ought to be doing but is obliged to do it according to the council’s dictates, have persisted in one form or the other over the years with varied outcomes.

Many years on, nothing has really changed in that the community has been left to deal with the effects of the council’s inadequacies. For example, £75,000 might be granted for ‘supporting and protecting people who are most in need’ i.e. the sociocultural, financial, housing and care needs which could well are the result of the council’s less relevant policies and practices.

A similar grant is available to promote another theme  - ‘united and involved communities’ - though the level or allocation of the community resources as well as the short-sighted community development practices might be causing the communal tension and resulting in less conducive atmosphere for different groups of people to become involved.



Veiled opposition to the Hindu school
Sharp increase in homelessness
Met racism inquiry

• Fuel poverty - a national problem
Code of conduct - public accountability
• Would standards committees be missed
'Don't play politics with the economy'
Broken Society'
HPCCG plight
Community consultation
• Housing benefit changes hit the vulnerable most

Community lettings
Threat to social cohesion
A school of national interest
The Freedom of Information (FOI) Act

NHS - Dr Foster Hospital Guide
Immigrants to create extra households?
Student unrest over fee
Progressive approach to town twinning
Twinning - Harrow's situation
Re-claiming the 'inner cities'
Housing benefit cuts – onslaught on vulnerable
'Big Society'

The HCJ is not under the influence of any political party nor it is in the business of promoting councillors or other elected representatives but it shares its analysis of socio-political and economic situations with voters to help them to make well informed democratic choices.

Copyright © 2005-2014 HCJ all pages